Post by account_disabled on Dec 30, 2023 9:15:19 GMT
Did you know? I heard the news on the news and the next morning, on the web, there were several sites reporting it. 600 university professors have written to the government complaining that students do not know Italian . The discovery of hot water. Have you only now noticed it? I've been seeing it for years, just read what Italians write online ( all Italians, not just university students) - or rather, just read how they write - in their blogs or in the various social networks. And among those there are a lot of people with degrees. I heard a teacher who was challenged for the grammatical errors he pointed out, because those errors were part of the boy's freedom of opinion.
But are we out of our minds? What does grammar have to do with freedom of opinion? Maybe someone doesn't know the difference between form and content . And what am I doing here? I'll explain it to you right away! The distinction between form and content In the second classical high school (fourth year of high school for those who don't know) my Italian and Latin teacher told me that my essays were good in form but poor in content (but they have been poor in content since middle school and such they Special Data remained until the final exam). The form is the spelling and grammatical correctness of the text, the content is the thoughts and opinions expressed in the text. To be clear, a novel must have good content (i.e. a good, well-structured, interesting story) and excellent form (it must not contain any grammatical errors: spelling, punctuation and syntax must be correct). Correcting the form of an essay does not mean suppressing the student's opinions. Anyone who claims this is ignorant.
Grammar, like mathematics, is not an opinion. “Third grade mistakes in degree theses” An ungrammatical thesis must be rejected . Ah, but if some teachers have the courage (or the "attributes") to do it, how much controversy (if not even complaints) will explode? Because for some time now we have become the country that pampers those who make mistakes and punishes and ghettoizes those who enforce the rules. I remember an episode from when I was attending Geology. A professor rejected the written exam of a guy I knew because of very serious grammatical errors. This guy was good, I think he graduated within the expected four years, but he was someone who asked how many "cs" used to spell "chocolate". Was that professor right to continually reject those written exams? Yes, for me he did well. The guy got promoted when he wrote decently.
But are we out of our minds? What does grammar have to do with freedom of opinion? Maybe someone doesn't know the difference between form and content . And what am I doing here? I'll explain it to you right away! The distinction between form and content In the second classical high school (fourth year of high school for those who don't know) my Italian and Latin teacher told me that my essays were good in form but poor in content (but they have been poor in content since middle school and such they Special Data remained until the final exam). The form is the spelling and grammatical correctness of the text, the content is the thoughts and opinions expressed in the text. To be clear, a novel must have good content (i.e. a good, well-structured, interesting story) and excellent form (it must not contain any grammatical errors: spelling, punctuation and syntax must be correct). Correcting the form of an essay does not mean suppressing the student's opinions. Anyone who claims this is ignorant.
Grammar, like mathematics, is not an opinion. “Third grade mistakes in degree theses” An ungrammatical thesis must be rejected . Ah, but if some teachers have the courage (or the "attributes") to do it, how much controversy (if not even complaints) will explode? Because for some time now we have become the country that pampers those who make mistakes and punishes and ghettoizes those who enforce the rules. I remember an episode from when I was attending Geology. A professor rejected the written exam of a guy I knew because of very serious grammatical errors. This guy was good, I think he graduated within the expected four years, but he was someone who asked how many "cs" used to spell "chocolate". Was that professor right to continually reject those written exams? Yes, for me he did well. The guy got promoted when he wrote decently.